Take it easy, my friend

life
academia
A letter to my younger self
Published

December 2, 2024

It’s easy to feel caught up in the (perceived) pressure to produce results quickly. Academia seems to prioritize speed and quantity over depth and quality, which can be overwhelming. But is this really true? If it is something you must rush to publish, is there any real value in it? Is it really of value if you need to “compete”? (Thiel 2014) Is the project you are rushing to publish really the question that you are best positioned to answer and that you deeply care about? Isn’t rushing things another form of cargo cult science?

What if, instead of frantically racing to publish, you took the time to slow down, breathe, and really dig into your research, the research you really care about and take pleasure in craftsmanship? We must admit that we are not immune to the allure of “fast science.” There’s something undeniably exciting about chasing quick breakthroughs and racking up publications. Yet, this isn’t the path to meaningful, impactful, sustainable research and happiness.

Great outcomes take time and persistence. Take the story of Rosalind Franklin, whose research laid the groundwork for understanding the structure of DNA. Or consider the godfathers of deep learning, who persisted through the AI winter. Galileo took 18 years to finish and write up his pendulum experiments and Newton took four years for his initial writings about gravity. (Newport 2024)

These scientists didn’t rush their work or cut it into “salami papers.” Instead, they took their time, and their persistence paid off.

Great outcomes can also not be easily optimized for. And this is, as Peter Drucker already realized, (Drucker 1999) especially difficult for knowledge work. It is a fact that metrics are deceiving and that stepping stones that lead to discoveries cannot be anticipated. (Stanley and Lehman 2015) Thus, as a field, we are bound to be less successful in the long run if we only optimize for bibliometrics. Trust yourself that your unique point of view will lead to something exciting. Looking less at oneself, comparing Google Scholar profiles, and instead being in awe of the exciting times we are in will also lead to more happiness. (Brooks 2022; Shiota, Keltner, and Mossman 2007; Dambrun 2017)

Great outcomes are also very diverse and happen on very different timescales. Even though some of our communications suggest otherwise (“Samantha is a great student because she published in Nature”), (Lawrence 2003) we do not only do well if we publish in Cell, Nature, or Science or other “vanity outlets.” We also do well if we build software that is used and that powers a full line of other research (think of the impact Python, Numpy, RDKit, Pymatgen, and similar tools had on our work). We also do well if we curate datasets that enable new discoveries. (Abbott et al. 2020) Ultimately, AlphaFold would not have been possible without the Protein Data Bank. While the systems with which we evaluate scientists only slowly evolve to reflect this reality, (Hicks et al. 2015) it is important to remember that great work will ultimately pay off and lead to much more satisfaction. Ultimately, those who decide on funding and career moves benefit from hindsight that editors do not have. (Lawrence 2003)

In a world filled with one-hit wonders and short-lived trends, it’s more important than ever to focus on creating meaningful, lasting contributions to your field. You want to be known for something great, not just a fleeting moment of recognition. Moreover, slowing down to a sustainable pace can help you avoid the pitfalls of academic burnout. It’s not about the number of publications or the speed at which you produce them; it’s about the quality of your work, the depth of your understanding, and the passion you bring to your research. To our knowledge, being stressed didn’t help anyone to think clearly. (McEwen 2007)

So, if you are feeling the pressure to constantly and rapidly produce, remember that taking it slow can lead to great things. Embrace the process, pursue your ideas with curiosity and dedication, and, most importantly, take the time to enjoy the journey. This journey isn’t a sprint — it’s a marathon. It will be more rewarding if you allow yourself the freedom to explore at your own pace. So, take a deep breath, and relax. In the end, you’ll be known not for a fleeting moment of recognition but for a lasting contribution to your field—a testament to your dedication, perseverance, and passion for your work.

DALL-E generated image for slow science

This text is inspired by a conversation with Alán Aspuru-Guzik. Alán also suggested the title with a reference to a song.

References

Abbott, L. F., D. D. Bock, E. M. Callaway, et al. 2020. “The Mind of a Mouse.” Cell 182 (6): 1372–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.010.
Brooks, Arthur C. 2022. “Don’t Objectify Yourself.” The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2022/09/how-be-less-self-centered/671499/.
Dambrun, Michael. 2017. “Self-Centeredness and Selflessness: Happiness Correlates and Mediating Psychological Processes.” PeerJ 5: e3306. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3306.
Drucker, Peter F. 1999. “Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge.” California Management Review 41 (2): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165987.
Hicks, Diana, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke, and Ismael Rafols. 2015. “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics.” Nature 520 (7548): 429–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a.
Lawrence, Peter A. 2003. “The Politics of Publication.” Nature 422 (6929): 259–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/422259a.
McEwen, Bruce S. 2007. “Physiology and Neurobiology of Stress and Adaptation: Central Role of the Brain.” Physiological Reviews 87 (3): 873–904. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00041.2006.
Newport, Cal. 2024. Slow Productivity: The Lost Art of Accomplishment Without Burnout. Penguin Books Limited.
Shiota, Michelle N., Dacher Keltner, and Amanda Mossman. 2007. “The Nature of Awe: Elicitors, Appraisals, and Effects on Self-Concept.” Cognition and Emotion 21 (5): 944–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600923668.
Stanley, Kenneth O., and Joel Lehman. 2015. Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15524-1.
Thiel, Peter. 2014. “Competition Is for Losers.” Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/articles/peter-thiel-competition-is-for-losers-1410535536.